
|
 |
|
MPR
Current Events
|
|
MPR adoptions for July include Ivory Angel,
Peaches, Fiesta, Diamond, Mr. Bojangles, Athena, Charna, Polka
Dot, Oreo, Blueberry, and Darth! Thank you all for making
this one of our most successful adoption months on record!!!
Besides all of the wonderful adoptions, July was another busy
month for MPR volunteers who worked hard to find additional
venues for adoption events. Our first event at the Brookside
Barkery and Bath was a success and we look forward to returning!
We also held a "leftover" yard sale and adoption
event July 30th and 31st.
Newcomers to the program this month include
Ivory
Angel, a deaf pup from Wichita who was already adopted,
and Petey
Rascal, a transfer from Friends
of Parkville Animal Shelter in Parkville, MO. We
were able to accept Petey into our program because of our
high adoption rate for the month!
MPR celebrates! Peaches, a MPR
rescue dog who has been waiting for 1.5 years for her very
own home, has finally had her dreams come true and has found
the home
of a lifetime! We were so upset thinking of our little
girl being overlooked for another year, thankfully she worked
her charm when interviewing prospective parents and she found
her forever match!
As always, if you are interested in volunteering,
sponsoring and adoption event, or have any other suggestions,
feel free to send them our way. Just drop us a line at email@mprgroup.net
>Top
|
"Pet"
Bull of the Month |
|
Tricked ya! Okay, maybe you knew, but
we doubt it, we were tricked initially, too! The truth of
the matter is that Mr. Cosmos is in fact probably not a pit
bull, but instead an exotic new breed known as a Catahoula
Bulldog. We went ahead and bailed him out of the shelter
anyway -his good looks and goofy personality worked in his
favor, and heck, he sure looks like a pit bull at times!
This boy is so stunning he's been described as a "piece
of art". We've just never seen another like him. From
head to toe he is unique and amazing.
Cosmos is fully housebroken, crate-trained, and is comfortable
around adults and older children alike. He is too smart for
his own good, and is very athletic. Strict outdoor supervision
and a 6 ft. privacy fence will be a must for this curious
boy!
>Top
|
Animal
Control Officer Interview |
July 19th, 2004
Q:Please give your name.
A:Jennifer
Dorr
Q: You used to work
at the (Kansas) City (Missouri) animal control facility. Were
pit bulls frequently brought into the shelter? Do you feel
there were more pit bulls in the shelter than any other single
breed usually?
A:Pit Bulls
were frequently brought into the shelter by officers but seldom
owner relinquished. Pit Bulls were probably the second most
popular breed in the shelter, the most common dogs were mixed-breed
dogs, like Chow and Shepherd mixes.
Q: What do you believe
is the reason behind the overwhelming popularity of pit bulls
in the inner-city today?
A:I believe
that people in the city own them for image because they are
seen as "tough" or "cool" dogs. They are
also dogs that can put up with a lot of abuse and still remain
friendly to people.
Q: Were most pits
that came to your shelter picked up as strays, dumped, or
confiscated?
A:Either picked
up as strays or taken on cruelty or neglect cases.
Q: Of the confiscated
dogs, were any seized for dogfighting? What were other reasons
they were seized? Are charges ever brought against the accused,
and if so, what is the penalty?
A:Not many
were taken for dog fighting but many had very obvious injuries
from dog fighting. Many were removed from their homes because
of lack of shelter, water, food, veterinary care, and many
were picked up running loose. It was impossible to prosecute
for dog fighting because in order to prosecute, one must witness
the fight. Either I did not witness it or in one case where
I did witness it, the involved parties were underage.
It was our policy at the time to euthanize anything that had
fighting injuries. This prevented the owner from getting the
dog back and fighting it again. It really bothered me at first
to put dogs to sleep that were essentially the victims. Then
we had two fighting dogs in
terrible shape that were picked up because the owner's mother
could not separate them.
Their bodies were covered in old and new wounds
and their heads were so swollen that they didn't even look
like dogs. The officer that picked them up did not euthanize
them because she wanted to pursue dog fighting charges. She
was forced to return the dogs to the owner and was never able
to prosecute. After this case, I decided that I would much
rather euthanize all of the fighting dogs than put them back
into that environment. At KCMO shelter, I learned that there
are things that are much worse than death, which is sometimes
the kindest option.
Q: Would it be safe
to say pit bulls were generally in worse shape than other
strays that were brought in to the city shelter?
A:I wouldn't say that pit
bulls were in any worse shape that the other strays. There
was a much larger percentage with fighting injuries but we
saw so many other grossly neglected dogs in the shelter. Some
of the pits were actually in great shape because their owners
took so much pride in them.
Q: What was the
temperament of most of the pits brought in? Were the ones
that were obviously abused (fought, starved, neglected, etc.)
human aggressive?
A:I would
say that 90% of the pits that I dealt with in the shelter
and on the streets as an officer were extremely friendly.
Most of the fought and neglected ones were super sweet to
people. It was very sad.
Q: Do you believe
there is a dogfighting problem in the metro?
A:Absolutely.
Q: Does any particular
pit bull stand out in your mind that you remember from your
time working at the shelter? What was their story? What became
of the dog?
A:There are
so many of them that really touched me. There was one that
was brought to the shelter by his owner because his owner
had shot him. The dog stood there as happy and friendly as
could be. He had a bullet wound in his neck and a huge exit
wound on the other side of his neck. He was a huge mess and
was still licking me and wagging. The owner stood there and
told me how he had owned the dog for several years and then
last night the dog had "turned" on him and he had
to shoot it.
Well, I am not a believer in dogs "turning"
on their owners without any provocation or previous behavioral
problems but the dog couldn't talk. I put the dog to sleep
because I could not work miracles and heal him and then find
a home for an adult male pit that "supposedly" attacked
its owner.
Later a police officer followed up with me
and it turns out that the dog owner was fighting with his
girlfriend and when he was trying to shoot her the dog got
between him and prevented him from killing the girlfriend.
I always think of this when I hear people say that pit bulls
"turn" on people.
Q: You work at a
suburban police department now. Do you ever take in pit bulls
in Lenexa?
A:We only
have a few in the City of Lenexa. I think that we receive
calls from concerned citizens every time these dogs go outside
to use the bathroom. We have probably impounded three or four
in the past year. We also have one who is able to pop his
front door open and he runs around his neighborhood trying
to make friends every couple of months.
Q: Have you noticed
that people in Lenexa feel differently about pit bulls than
people in the city? What do you think is the best way to improve
the breed's reputation?
A:The majority
of the calls that I receive here on pit bulls are people who
are concerned that their neighbor has one and Animal Control
needs to come and pick it up because they think pit bulls
are illegal. There is no breed-specific legislation in Lenexa
so we explain to these callers that we do not have a problem
with the dogs, just with irresponsible owners. I think that
the best way to improve the breed's reputation is through
education. Many of the people I talk to about pit bulls have
never even seen one and have only heard about them on TV.
When they actually see one, they cannot believe how friendly
they are.
Q: Do you believe
in breed-specific legislation? If not, do you have any other
solutions to prevent the breed from falling into the wrong
hands?
A:I strongly
believe that breed specific legislation unfairly punishes
responsible owners. I feel that if a City bans pit bulls,
they are encouraging people who use pits for status to get
other dogs such as Presa Canary dogs, Cane Corsos, Fila Brasilarios,
etc., which may be even more dangerous due to size and breed
characteristics.
I don't have the answer on how to prevent
the wrong people from acquiring pit bulls. I do think that
strict enforcement for irresponsible dog owners, more pressure
on the judicial system to take animal cases seriously, and
increased public education about pit bulls may help to remove
some of these dogs from the wrong hands. Then we are faced
with the problem of having to determine what should be done
with these damaged dogs.
Q: Is there anything
you would like to add?
A:I would
just like to give pit bull rescuers a pat on the back. Pit
bulls are a wonderful breed but trying to find homes for them
has got to be one of the most difficult things to do. Keep
up the good work.
>Top
|
Breed-Specific
Legislation |
|
By: Casey Martinez,
Animal Resource Fund*
After coming home from a stroll with their newly rescued dog,
the Bishop family was surprised when an animal control officer
was standing at their door. It seemed there had been a complaint
about their dog by a neighbor. The family insisted that this
must be a mistake: their dog was current on his vaccinations,
was never allowed to run off leash, and had been responsibly
neutered. The animal control officer quickly explained that
although their dog had caused no “problems," the
issue was that their 35-pound dog which had been identified
by a veterinarian as a French Bulldog/Boxer mix, “looked”
like a Pit Bull. Since Pit Bulls are banned in the city, they
were ordered to remove the dog from city limits within 72
hours. Does this sound unfair, irrational, and possibly even
crazy? Unfortunately, this scenario happens daily in the Kansas
City metro area where breed-specific legislation (BSL) is
running rampant.
Many proponents of BSL will use the Center
for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics regarding dog
bites to have specific breeds banned from their cities. What
these BSL advocates do not tell you is that the CDC does not
support BSL. In fact, in a special report titled “Breeds
of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States
between 1979 and 1998”, the CDC indicates, “data
may be biased…” Among the reasons they cite are
the following, “to the extent that attacks by 1 breed
are more newsworthy than those by other breeds, our methods
may have resulted in differential ascertainment of fatalities
by breed” and “because identification of a dog’s
breed may be subjective (even experts may disagree on the
breed of a particular dog), DBRF [dog bite related fatalities]
may be differentially ascribed to breeds with a reputation
for aggression.” In their conclusion they acknowledge
the following:
Although fatal attacks on humans
appear to be a breed-specific problem… other breeds
may bite and cause fatalities at higher rates. Because of
difficulties inherent in determining a dog’s breed
with certainty, enforcement of breed-specific ordinances
raises constitutional and practical issues.
Breed misidentification is only one
of the many reasons why BSL is not the best alternative for
our community. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
asserts that, “many of the factors that affect a dog’s
propensity to bite are no more specific to a pit bull than
they are to a poodle.” In a May-June 2001 article called
“Blame the Breed?” the HSUS cites the following
statistics:
- Since 1975, dogs belonging to more
than 30 breeds have been responsible for fatal attacks on
people.
- Sexually intact dogs are 2.6 times
more likely to bite than sterilized dogs
- Chained dogs are 2.8 times more
likely to bite than unchained dogs
Nearly all reputable organizations that
know anything about dogs, including the CDC, HSUS and many
others such as the American Veterinary Medical Association,
the American Kennel Club (AKC), the National Animal Control
Association, and the American Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals, oppose BSL in favor of enforcing responsible
pet ownership. Alternatives suggested by these organizations
are as follows:
- Lobby for non-breed specific laws
such as a dangerous dog law
that would punish owners that allow their dogs to run off
leash or deliberately train their dog to be a danger to
others. A new law that is gaining momentum and that has
recently been passed in Lawrence is an anti-tethering
law. According to an article
in the Lawrence Journal World titled City
decision goes to the dogs,
the law will “prohibit people from keeping a dog chained
for more than one hour at a time, for a maximum of three
hours a day, with required three-hour breaks between chaining.”
- Enforce existing laws.
Many cities already have dangerous dog laws and leash laws
that are not enforced. It is essential that the public insist
that these laws are enforced.
- Educate the public
on responsible dog ownership by providing responsible dog
ownership seminars and canine safety education. Education
should include the importance of spaying
and neutering and the dangers
of allowing their dog to run at large.
Another statistic fallacy that the CDC
explains on their website is the fact that they have no data
regarding how many dogs there are of one breed in the United
States and therefore the numbers gathered have absolutely
no meaning. In other words, the numbers would have more significance
if they could compare the number of bites per breed versus
the number of dogs of that breed that exist in our country.
According to the American Temperament Test Society, Inc.,
a nonprofit organization dedicated to “uniform temperament
evaluation of purebred and spayed/neutered mixed-breed dogs,"
over 83.9% of the American Pit Bull Terriers and 82.2% of
Rottweilers tested, have passed their temperament test. This
is compared to 79.2% of Border Collies, 76.2% of Australian
Shepherds, and 80.9% of breeds on average. These figures seem
to indicate that our view of certain breeds have been skewed
by positive or negative media attention, depending on the
breed.
The bottom line is that BSL is not a
community’s answer to dog bite prevention. In addition
to the reasons mentioned before, the AKC has this to say about
BSL:
Breed-specific laws are not the
best way to protect communities. An owner intent on using
his or her dogs for malicious purposes will simply be able
to switch to another type of dog and continue to jeopardize
public safety. The list of regulated breeds or types could
grow every year without ever addressing responsible dog
ownership. Deeds, not breeds, should be addressed.
For additional information regarding
this unfair epidemic you may visit the following websites:
>Top
|
Support
MPR |
|
Ways To Help MPR
If you love pit bulls and want to make a difference for them
you can help MPR in many ways. We hope you can join our team
of volunteers and supporters!
Volunteer Support
Donate your time helping MPR by fostering homeless pit bulls,
helping care for dogs in boarding, assist with adoption events,
printing materials, etc. If you would like to volunteer, please
fill out our form HERE.
Financial Support
Donate cash or supplies for saving more pit bulls, assisting
with medical expenses and veterinary treatment, boarding costs
for dogs without foster homes, food and toys, crates and kennels,
adoption events and printed materials, all donations are tax
deductible!
*You may donate via
PayPal on MPR’s website or checks can be sent to:
Missouri
Pit Bull Rescue
PO Box 520043
Independence, MO 64052
Community Support
Educate your neighbors, friends and family on the plight of
pit bulls. Encourage responsible pet ownership, spay/neuter
your pets, and contact your local representatives to voice
your opinions about BSL in your area. Report abuse, neglect
or abandonment of animals to local authorities, including
any suspected dog-fighting!
Sponsorship Programs
Our Sponsorship programs offer several different ways you
can help each dog. If you are interested sponsoring one of
our dogs, please go HERE.
>Top
|
|
Volunteer
of the Month
|
|
With MPR since 2003, Nick is a valuable member
of our kennel team and does a great job with the MPR dogs
awaiting their forever homes. Kennel duties include cleaning
runs, grooming, feeding, playing with, and running the dogs,
and just sitting with them and giving them cuddles, kisses,
and pets.
Nick is also an active foster home and has
fostered MPR alum Waylon
most recently, whom he had a big hand in rescuing, among others.
Nick helps out at most MPR adoption events and we don't know
what we'd do without him!
>Top
|
|
MPR
Wish List
|
- Dog Houses
- Frontline Plus
- Dog Treats and Rawhide Bones
- Toys and Blankets
- Premium Dog Food
- Heartguard heartworm preventative
- Large Wire Dog Crates
>Top
|
MPR
Gear |
|
If you want to look hip and help pit bulls
at the same time, check out the gear available on our web
site! We have t-shirts, mugs, bumper stickers and more! Go
to MPR Shop!
>Top
|
Featured
Happy Ending |
Reina and Buddy sitting in a tree - K-I-S-S-I-N-G!
We're just so thankful for the great work that MPR does on
behalf of this awesome breed, because without MPR we wouldn't
have the great furkids that we do.
Reina and Buddy bring us many amazing, funny, delightful,
and loving moments every day. We especially enjoy receiving
those very special "pittie kisses," snuggling with
them, and spoiling them rotten. They'll never have to be concerned
about being abandoned, abused, hurt, or without a loving home
ever again! This is our forever commitment to them.
-Sharon
(Reina is an MPR alum and Buddy was
recently adopted from an independent rescuer in Oklahoma to
complete their new home. Congratulations, you two lovebirds!)
>Top
|
|